CHARLIE MASSEY: CRIMINAL COURT APPLICATION FOR SUMMONS FOR ARREST FOR FRAUD

 

APPLICATION FOR SUMMONS OR WARRANT FOR ARREST

FOR ALLEGED OFFENCE

(Criminal Procedure Rules, rule 7.2(6); section 1, Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980)

 

 

This is an application by JOSEPH LOZE ONWUDE                                            (name of applicant)

for the court to issue a summons against the proposed defendant.

Applicant’s address: THE CROFT, WARLEY ROAD, GREAT WARLEY, BRENTWOOD CM13 3HT

Email address: jonwude9@gmail.com

Phone: 0745 976 2172                                   Mobile: 0745 976 2172

 

FRAUD by Registrar of the General Medical Council, Manchester

Date(s) of alleged offence(s): 7/6/2021, 16/6/2021, 13/7/2021

 

Proposed defendants

Mr. Charlie Massey, 3 Hardman Street, Manchester M3 3AW.

Email address (if known): occe@gmc-uk.org

Phone (if known): 0161 923 6602                  Mobile:

 

1. Complete the box above and give the details required in the boxes below.[1]

2. Sign and date the completed form.

3. Send or deliver a copy of the completed form to the magistrates’ court office.

Do not send this form to the proposed defendant unless the court tells you to do so.

The court may determine your application with or without a hearing and without receiving representations from the proposed defendant. The court will not usually arrange a hearing so it is important that the information you put in this form is complete and accurate.

(1)  Consent to prosecute

Do you need consent to prosecute?                                                                                          Yes   No

 

If yes, you must include with your application written evidence of that consent.

Some offences may not be prosecuted without the consent of the Attorney General, the Director of Public Prosecutions or another authority. The legislation that creates the offence will say whether such consent is required.

(2)  Previous application(s)

Have you applied before for the issue of a summons or warrant in respect of any of the allegations you are making?                                                                                                                                       Yes   No

 

If yes, give details. Include the name of the court to which you applied, the date of the application and the name of the proposed defendant you gave that court if that was different to the name in this application.

 

 

(3)  Other proceedings

Has any other prosecutor ever brought a criminal case against the proposed defendant in respect of any of the allegations you are making?                                                                                             Yes   No

 

 

If yes, give details. Include the name of the prosecutor, the court in which the case was brought and the result.

 

(4) Details of the alleged offence(s)

Crim PR 7.3 requires that an allegation of an offence in an application for the issue of a summons or warrant must contain (a) a statement of the offence that (i) describes the offence in ordinary language, and (ii) identifies any legislation that creates it; and (b) such particulars of the conduct constituting the commission of the offence as to make clear what the prosecutor alleges against the defendant.

 

4.i Offence of Fraudulent Withdrawal of Licence to Practice

 

Fraud is one of the most serious offences on the criminal calendar because it wholly undermines the whole basis of the administration of justice: Chapman J in R v Warne (1980) 2 Cr. App. R. (S) 42.

 

4.ii  Rule 7.3 (1) (a) (i) Crim.PR: Description of the Offence

Mr Charlie Massey fraudulently allowed my Licence to Practice to be withdrawn on the basis that  that I had not gone through the 5-yearly REVALIDATION PROCESS which was due in March 2020. It was completed by their recommended External Appraiser and a certificate was issued on 12/3/2020. This was sent to the GMC by 14/3/2020. The GMC never acknowledged it. They claimed I did not revalidate. They have subsequently satetd that I did not properly revalidate on 7/6/2021. As there was a dispute, a trial was necessary per Article 6(1), 6(3) and 7(1).

Without a trial, my Licence to Practice my profession was withdrawn I was punished without law.

 

As I had REVALIDATED, this withdrawal was fraudulent because it was based on a lie. This was massive fraud.

 

4.iii  Rule 7.3 (1) (a) (ii) Crim.PR: Legislation that Creates the Offence

The Fraud Act, 2006

 

4.iv Particulars of the conduct constituting the commission of the offence

Fraud is serious indictable only offence. Another case where he is involved in allegations of torture of a doctor registrant of the GMC shows a pattern of behaviours – Breach of Article of the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998

 

 

 

(5)  Summary of the circumstances

CrimPR 7.2(6)

Fraud is a serious indictable only offence, precise documentary evidence in email form is available.

 

Grounds

Breach of Article 6(1): Denied the Right to Trial

Breach of Article 6(3): Obstructed from practising his Profession on a lie that he had not revalidated;

Breach of Article 7(1): No Punishment without Law.

 

Indication of Evidence List

1. Email list between 7/6/2021 and 13/7/2021

2. The Revalidation Bundle that shows that the Fraud was about a Lie that I did not revalidate.

 

(6)  Application for warrant

Complete this box only if you are applying for the court to issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest. Under s.1, Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 the court can issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest only where (a)(i) the offence to which the warrant relates can be, or must be, tried in the Crown Court, (ii) the offence is punishable with imprisonment, or (iii) the defendant’s address is not sufficiently established for a summons to be served on him or her and (b) (in all cases) the Director of Public Prosecutions consents to the issue of the warrant.

 

(a) Conditions relating to the offence or the defendant. Tick as many boxes as apply.

(i) the offence can be, or must be, tried in the Crown Court                                                           

(ii) the offence is punishable with imprisonment                                                                                 

(iii) the defendant’s address is not sufficiently established for a summons to be served                            

Explain why, including what you have done to find an address for the defendant.

ONLY WORKPLACE ADDRESS IS AVAILABLE

(b) The Director of Public Prosecutions consents to the issue of a warrant for the defendant’s arrest

                                                                                                                                                               Yes   No

If yes, you must include with your application written evidence of that consent.

 

(7)  Declaration.  See Criminal Procedure Rules r.7.2(6), (7). You may be asked to make this declaration on oath.

To the best of my knowledge, information and belief:

(a) the allegations contained in this application are substantially true,

(b) the evidence on which I rely will be available at the trial,

(c) the details that I have given in boxes (2) and (3) are true, and

(d) this application discloses all the information that is material to what the court must decide.

 

Signed:  (applicant)

 

Date: 16/11/2021

Decision – this record must be kept by the court

I considered this application today [at] [without] a hearing.

[The applicant confirmed on oath or affirmation the declaration in box (7).]

[The applicant gave me additional information [the essence of which was:]][2]

 

 

 

 

[The proposed defendant gave me additional information [the essence of which was:]][3]

 

 

 

 

On the basis of the information contained in this application [as supplemented by the additional information described above]:

(a) I [am] [am not] satisfied that the requirements for the issue of a summons are met

[(b) I [am] [am not] satisfied that the additional requirements for the issue of a warrant are met][4]

and I [issue] [refuse to issue] a [summons] [warrant] accordingly.

 

My reasons are these: The court should give a brief indication of its conclusions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signed: ………………………………………..…………………………………………………………...…

Name: ………………………………………..…………..…..… [Justice of the Peace]

                                                                                                [District Judge (Magistrates’ Court)]

                                                                                                [Justices’ Clerk / assistant clerk]

Date: ………………………….

 

 



[2] Include a brief summary of any information unless it is recorded elsewhere.

[3] Include a brief summary of any information unless it is recorded elsewhere.

[4] Complete only if the application includes an application for the issue of a warrant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Racism still exists at the GMC: A Personal View based on Experience

A Systematic Review of Section 40 Statutory Appeals under The Medical Act 1983 Against The General Medical Council On Decisions To Erase A Doctor From The UK Medical Register For Dishonesty Between 2003-2017.