'Laying an Information' Against CHARLIE MASSEY for FRAUD in REVALIDATION SCAM
THE MAGISTRATE COURT OF JUSTICE
GMC 3608119
Westminster Magistrates Court
181
Marylebone Road, London NW1 5BR.
Between
Dr. Joseph Onwude Claimant
Mr. Charlie Massey Defendant
Fraudulent Misrepresentation (7/6/2021 - 13/7/2021) within the
Tort of Deceit
PRIVATE
PROSECUTION
‘Laying
an Information’
The Parties
1. The claimant private prosecutor is Dr. Joseph Onwude of The Croft, Warley Road, Great Warley, Brentwood CM13 3HT.
2. The defendant is Mr. Charlie Massey, Chief Executive Officer and Registrar, General Medical Council (The GMC), 3 Hardman Street, Manchester M3 3AW.
3a. This claim is for damages from fraudulent misrepresentation against Dr. Onwude between 7 June 2021 and 13 July 2021 at the General Medical Council concerning Revalidation Process due on March 2020. This led to a fraudulent process that was criminal in process and an outcome that caused malicious damages to Article 6(3) Human Rights Act 1998 in the Right to Practice my Profession, which is an absolute right.
3b. The tort
of deceit makes a factual representation, knowing that it is false, or reckless
or indifferent about its veracity, intending that another person relies on it, who
then acts in reliance on it, to that person's own detriment.
3c. The damages arise from the fraudulent processes and power that deprive Dr. Onwude from being able to earn and care for his family from a fraudulent lie by the GMC because I did REVALIDATE.
4. There was a deliberate
action on the part of the wrongdoer, often involving dishonest conduct.
5. The statutory power of this action is based on
section 6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 which allows a member of
the public to bring a private prosecution for any offence.
6. This ‘Laying an Information’ at the Magistrates
Court is based on Criminal Justice Act 2003, Section 30 (4): Nothing in section
29 affects—(b) the power of a person who is not a public prosecutor to lay an
information for the purpose of obtaining the issue of a summons or warrant
under Section 1 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43)”.
7. There is no obligation upon a magistrate or clerk to make any inquiries before issuing a warrant. A warrant may be issued without giving the parties an opportunity to make representations and without a hearing (R.7.4(1) Criminal Procedure Rules, 2014).
7a. Order sought: Issue of summons to appear before a Crown Court (Rule 7.2 of the Criminal Procedure Rules, 2014).
7b. Where the offence charged is an ‘indictable only offence’, a warrant under this section may be issued at any time notwithstanding that a summons has previously been issued Section 6 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980.
8. TRANSFER TO THE CROWN COURT
In respect of anyone appearing before the magistrate’s court on an indictable only offence, the magistrate’s court must immediately transfer the case to the Crown Court, Section 51(1) Crime and Disorder Act 1998.
9. The fraudulent misrepresentation
was through a series of three emails on 7th
June 2021, 16th June 2021 and 13th July 2012, two from
the defendant Mr. Abadaki and the third from the General Medical Council. This
will be attributed to the Chief
Executive Officer and Registrar of the GMC, Mr. Charlie Massey.
10. The statutory
Revalidation Process is due every 5 years Council (Licence to Practise and Revalidation
Regulations 2012) with yearly Appraisal
exercises.
12. The damages for
Fraudulent Misrepresentation arise from breaches of Articles of the Human
Rights Act, 1998:
12a. Breach of Article 6(1): Where the right of a
trial was denied despite statutory GMC Licence to Practise and Revalidation
Regulations 2012, which is not Primary Parliamentary Legislation where there
was a dispute between the GMC, the Public body and the victim.
12b. Breach of Article 6(3): Where the right to
practice my profession is fraudulently denied where there was a dispute between
the GMC, the Public body and the victim.
12c. Breach of Article 7(1): Where the right not to be
punished without Law where there was a dispute between the GMC, the Public body
and the victim.
13. Article
13 HRA 1998 makes sure that if people’s rights are violated they are able
to access effective remedy. This means they can take their case to court to
seek a judgment. The Human Rights Act is designed to make sure this
happens.
14. i.
The claimant was informed to revalidate by end of March 2020.
14. v. 7/6/2021 - Summary of Email 1:
revalidation-support@gmc-uk.org
Mon
07/06/2021 08:28
·
Decision on withdrawal of your licence to
practise
· We have considered all of the information
and evidence and an Assistant Registrar has made a decision to
withdraw your licence to practise in accordance with the GMC (Licence to
Practise and Revalidation) Regulations 2012.
o WHAT INFORMATION IF I
DID NOT SUBMIT A REVALIDATION?
o I have sent a copy of
their decision to your registered address by recorded post. If you do not
receive this letter within two working days please contact us on 0161 923 6602
to let us know.
o EVIDENCE of recorded
post
o We will withdraw your
licence to practise on 13 July 2021.
o You must not practice
in the UK
o From 13 July 2021 you
must not undertake any form of medical practice within the UK, which requires
you to hold a licence to practise.
o Your name will remain
on the medical register but will show you do not have a licence to practise.
Appealing the decision
You can appeal this
decision. If you wish to appeal, you must do so in writing before 6 July 2021.
Before making your
appeal, you should carefully consider your reasons why you are appealing and if
you will be able to provide robust and objective evidence in support of your
appeal.
CLAIMANTS COMMENTS
1. No reasons given
for withdrawal of license.
THE CEO MUST TAKE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS ORGANISATION
14. vi. 16/6/2021-
Summary of Email 2:
revalidation-support@gmc-uk.org
Wed
16/06/2021 14:24
· Reiterates their
decision of 7/6/2021
· DATE TO APPEAL
6/7/2021
· Appealing the decision
· The Doctor Support
Service
David
Abadaki, Revalidation Adviser, Registration and Revalidation Directorate, The
GMC. Tel 0161 923 6277, www.gmc-uk.org.
CLAIMANTS COMMENTS
1. No reasons given for withdrawal of license.
14. vii. 13/7/2021- Summary of Email 3: revalidation-support@gmc-uk.org
Tues
13/7/2021 14:00
·
From 13/07/2021 you are no longer licensed to practise medicine
in the UK.
·
We have withdrawn your licence for the reasons set out in our
previous letter
·
Your name remains on the list of registered medical
practitioners and you will continue to pay a reduced annual retention fee. Any
change in fee will be calculated from the date your licence was withdrawn. If
you wish to remove your name from the register then you will need to apply to
give up your registration (also known as voluntary erasure).
·
You must not work in any role which requires you to hold a
licence to practise
·
If you are currently working in a role which requires you to
hold a licence to practise you must stop immediately.
What you need to do now
·
If you do not need a licence to practise, you do not need to do
anything else.
· If you need a licence to
practise, you will need to apply to restore your licence. As part of your
application you will need to provide robust evidence as to how you have now met
the requirements for your revalidation that you previously failed to do and led
to your licence being withdrawn. The reasons are set out in our previous
letter. It is likely it will take longer for us to make a decision on any
application to restore your licence, than our normal processes.
General Medical Council
CLAIMANTS COMMENTS
1. No reasons given
for withdrawal of license.
2. Reference to Previous letter (s): NONE
WAS RECEIVED.
Wed
16/06/2021 14:24
· Sorry to hear about my
health issues – so I responded to their email of 7/6/2021.
· Reiterates their
decision of 7/6/2021
· DATE TO APPEAL
6/7/2021
· Appealing the decision
· The Doctor Support
Service
From
David Abadaki, Revalidation Adviser,
Registration and Revalidation Directorate, The GMC. Tel 0161 923 6277,
www.gmc-uk.org.
16. Th claimant declares that he does not accept the GMC
scam to withdraw his License by an email on 10/11/2021:
Mr.
Joseph Onwude FRCOG
The
Croft, Warley Road, Great Warley, Brentwood CM13 3HT
Mr. Charlie
Massey, 10/11/2021
Registrar
and CEO
General
Medical Council
3
Hardman Street
Manchester
M3 3AW
Mr. Massey,
By this letter, I am notifying you and challenging your authority
as CEO and Registrar of the General Medical Council, that I will not
obey the GMC's sham authority that I stopped practicing on the
basis that i did not revalidate as instructed in 2020. I did revalidate
as mandated TO DO.
I received three emails relating to Revalidation and threats to withdraw my Licence to Practice. I only considered them as threats, and later as GMC SCAMS.
These came from a 'Mr. Abadaki' who could not spell 'Licence'. I believed that this was a scam perpetuated by you through Mr. Abadaki.
I implore you to look urgently into this before it blows in your face. Like Shipman, you will not want Scamming by GMC CEO and Mr. Abadaki to be a yours and your family's lasting memory.
Look into it. I DID REVALIDATE. FOR THIS DISPUTE AND INJURY, I EXPECT TO MEET YOU ALSO IN CRIMINAL COURT AS A PRIVATE PROSECUTION.
Joseph Onwude
0745 976 2172
Cc Mr. Jim Percival
17. Limitations
This private Prosecution is within the time limit of ONE
YEAR.
18. Damages
The damages for Fraudulent Misrepresentation arise
from breaches of Articles of the Human Rights Act, 1998:
18. a. Breach of Article 6(1): Where the right of a
trial was denied despite statutory GMC Licence to Practise and Revalidation
Regulations 2012, which is not Primary Parliamentary Legislation where there
was a dispute between the GMC, the Public body and the victim.
18. b. Breach of Article 6(3): Where the right to
practice my profession is fraudulently denied where there was a dispute between
the GMC, the Public body and the victim.
18. c. Breach of Article 7(1): Where the right not to
be punished without Law where there was a dispute between the GMC, the Public
body and the victim.
18.d. Article 13 HRA 1998 makes sure that if people’s rights are
violated they are able to access effective remedy. This means they can take
their case to court to seek a judgment. The Human Rights Act is designed
to make sure this happens.
Mr. Charlie Massey as Chief Executive Officer and Registrar of the GMC is responsible for the Articles of the HRA 1998 of the public body, The GMC against their victim.
STATEMENT OF TRUTH: I believe
that the facts in these particulars of claim are true.
Date: 16/11/2021
Comments
Post a Comment