DRAFT ORDER OF DAMAGES: CIVIL TORTURE

Draft of Order for Damages for TORTURE OF ONE OF THE GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL’S REGISTRANTS BY THE GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS FROM 14 UNLAWFUL ALLEGATIONS:



The Court Orders the General Medical Council to pay damages amounting to £6,423,220.00


For the following Unlawful and Illegal Breaches of the Applicable Torture Acts:

    1. Breach of Section 3 of the HRA 1998: YOU MUST NOT TORTURE
    2. Breach of the Torture not to inflict "intentional or severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person or under the control of the accused.
    3. Breach of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
    4. Breach of the Torture and Damages Act 2009.


Basis of the Damages

  1. GMC AND MPTS FIND IMPAIRMENT ON THE 14 ALLEGATIONS FILED in

2015 but

    1. either dismissed on appeal [17/3/2017] by Collins J;
    2. withdrawn [5/6/2018- 2/11/2018] or
    3. defeated at Remitted hearings Between 5/6/2018 – 2/11/2018.

    5. THE GMC AND MPTS ERASE THE REGISTRANT BASED ON THE FTP

RULES OF ORDER which were not in force in 2015.

  1. At SECTION 40 APPEAL ON 17/3/2017, COLLIN J DISMISSED THE SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS, NEVER TO BE REPEATED –5 ALLEGATIONS.
    1. THE ALLEGATION OF DISHONESTY.
    2. THE ALLEGATION TO CAUSE DISTRESS TO MY PATIENTS.
  2. AT THE EMITTED HEARINGS, THE GMC REFERRED TO FITNESS TO PRACTICE ON 17/3/2017, WHEN THE GMC/MPTS WAS DISMISSED IN ALL BUT ONE ALLEGATION WHICH WAS ADMITTED.
  3. THE GMC MPTS UNLAWFULLY AND ILLEGALLY ACTED IN CONCERT TO TORTURE A REGISTRANT.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Racism still exists at the GMC: A Personal View based on Experience

  GMC ANTI-BLOG_20 February 2022 Mr. Joseph Loze Onwude, MBBS, FRCOG, MSc, DLSH&TM, Cert (Comp Sci) The Croft, Warley Road, Great Warley, Brentwood CM13 3HT, UK. Email: joeloze@outlook.com No source of funding Racism still exists at the GMC: A Personal View based on Experience   The behavior of the General Medical Council (GMC) can no longer be hidden as an allegory for doctors undergoing disciplinary hearings, if judged by the decisions reached for white doctors and non-white doctors. racism is still real for non-white doctors but it could not previously be labelled so because of the potential for backlash. But an appreciation of ‘Racism’ is a current issue and doctors are still too polite to say so.   The starting point is whether that doctor has ever felt discriminated against on by the NHS. If not, this can soon change after he travels the corridors of the GMC in Manchester. As a doctor who has never felt discrimination in the NHS, after my own ...
Read more

A Systematic Review of Section 40 Statutory Appeals under The Medical Act 1983 Against The General Medical Council On Decisions To Erase A Doctor From The UK Medical Register For Dishonesty Between 2003-2017.

  Mr. Joseph Loze Onwude, MBBS, MSc, DLSH&TM, FRCOG. , Dip Comp Sci. Retired Gynaecologist, Statistician, and Epidemiologist Medico-Legal Services for Doctors Correspondence: Mr. Joseph Loze Onwude, Apartment 51 Whitecroft Works, 69 Furnace Hill, Sheffield S3 7AH, UK.   Email: jonwude9@gmail.com   No Source of Funding. There is no Patient or Public Involvement. Abstract Research Question Does the General Medical Council (GMC) understand the allegation and appreciate the finding of dishonesty when it erases doctors from the Medical Register? Research Aim and Objectives Aim To systematically assess Section 40 appeals against the General Medical Council (GMC) when erasure from the Medical Register is recommended after the Medical Act 1983 was amended in 2002. Objectives 1. To classify the appeal decisions following a Section 40 appeal to erase a doctor from the Medical Register for serious misconduct for dishonest...
Read more